Filed under: - Change Execution, - Organization Change Management, - People Change Management, - Project Management, - Strategy Execution | Tags: Change Management, LinkedIn, Projects, ROI, Transformation
Few organizations have figured out how to do strategy execution well. One of the enigmas of implementation continues to be the gap between project management and change management. This post is a review of a new book that tackles this very challenge. The Next Evolution—Enhancing and Unifying Project and Change Management: The Emergence One Method for Total Project Success is by Thomas Jarocki (Brown & Williams Publishing LLC, NJ, USA, 2011).
Filed under: - Change Execution, - Organization Change Management, - People Change Management, - Strategy Execution | Tags: Adoption, Burning Platform, Change Management, Effectiveness, Leadership, LinkedIn, Organization Design, Planning, Projects, ROI, Transformation
Ask 10 people “what is change management?” and you will get 10 very different answers. So YES definition is important!
Many Leaders come to the term “Change Management” and intuitively believe they know what it means – and that they are already doing it. However, behind these innocuous words is a highly specialized discipline that has been evolving over the past 60 years.
Understanding Change Management offers untapped opportunity to drive more value to the bottom line.
The broad definition
It’s about “managing change”, i.e. taking a strategy and managing the implementation right? Well, yes, in the broadest sense.
My own definition starts from strategic alignment and extends through delivery to seeing the results track in.
Change management encompasses an array of multi-disciplinary capabilities:
- Leadership and Strategic Planning
- Project specific capabilities, e.g. Strategic Marketing, Organization Design and Development, Business Process Re-engineering, Technology Implementation
- People Change Management (PCM), Training and Communications
- Portfolio / Program / Project Management
Realizing full ROI only happens when ALL of these are INTEGRATED and OPTIMIZED.
Of note, you will see “Change Management” appear on many position descriptions and job postings these days. This reference typically refers to a general understanding of the nature of change and high level awareness of the process that might be required for straightforward transitional change.
Underneath this broad definition though is a deeper, more powerful, resource - what I term “People Change Management”. It is increasingly recognized that this so-called “soft stuff” represents the highest risk to transformational change. It also represents the greatest opportunity for driving value and for competitive advantage.
The deep definition - People Change Management (PCM)
Kurt Lewin got us started and many others have continued the work of understanding how to help people traverse change. The business notion is that the faster we can get employees to stop doing the old thing and start doing the new thing, the faster the ROI comes in.
Some of the renowned names in the field include: William Bridges, John Kotter, Peter Senge. Others have gone deeper and applied it to the ”hows” of managing change faster and better: Linda Ackerman-Anderson, Dean Anderson, Rick Mauer, Jeff Hiatt and our own Daryl Conner.
How do I think of People Change Management? It:
- Reduces people-related risks (eg resistance and misunderstandings) that effect costly delays, re-work, error / waste and turnover
- Increases and expedites user “adoption, proficiency and ultimate utilization” (Prosci Learning) thereby optimizing business results
- Encompasses a structured process and tool sets
- Includes: Leader (Sponsor) support, stakeholder management, change readiness, business impact, communication, training, and change metrics as well as contingency planning and interventions as required
- Engages users in the change, shares information, improves solutioning and expedites the transition to the ‘new state’
How does Conner Partners define “Change Management”?
Change management is the orchestration of change in a way that identifies and addresses the human risks involved in implementing change. This strengthens the individual and organizational ability to handle change well and increases the chances that the change will be put successfully into practice.
Of note, this very tactical and process-driven application of Change Management is deployed within Programs and Projects. It is substantively different than the generic competency requirement on position descriptions and job posting.
Mastery at this level prepares Leaders and Practitioners to deal with high risk, disruptive change – transformational change. Mastery often encompasses Organizational Development capabilities associated with: organizational behaviour, organizational design, learning and development, compensation, culture change, etc.
PCM Current Maturity Levels?
Prosci Learning has a neat little Maturity Model here that articulates a development path from novice to mastery. My experience is that few organizations have reached level 5 – and even fewer have an integrated, end-to-end, execution approach (a PMO is not “it”).
Most organizations are great at some components of change or they would not be around today. However, few (very few) are great at the whole array.
What a great opportunity for developing competitive advantage! In fact, many Fortune 500 companies are going beyond adding the generic competency onto position descriptions and beyond adding Change Management checklists into project management methodology. Many are in the process of developing Enterprise capability through Change Management Communities of Practice, Centres of Excellence and even dedicated leadership positions.
Deeper still – specialties within Change Management
In a recent discussion on LinkedIn one of the practitioners I have come to respect, Faith Fuqua-Purvis, proposed the notion of specialists within Change Management (much as within engineering there are Civil, Mechanical, Electrical, etc). I see this as key, for example “Communications” in Change Management is NOT the same as broadcasting information – it is not a PR or MarCom definition – it requires engaging Change Targets in 2-way dialogue. Furthermore, the notion of “risk communication” is also important here – effectively communicating with people who are “in crisis” is very different than day-to-day communications.
The specialities could include:
- Defining strategic intent at an operational level with a realization focus, e.g. developing Vision and Mission Statements (not as simple as it sounds – I have seen many a project set the wrong trajectory with the wrong vision / mission statement – and this is NOT something that should be a whimsical engagement ploy)
- Training and coaching sponsors and agents in change leadership/management
- Enrolling sponsors and targets in this change. Surfacing and resolving resistance. Building and sustaining commitment.
- Developing and deploying communications (informational and conversational, commitment focussed)
- Anticipating, designing, resourcing and deploying specific types of interventions
- Risk Management (against proven risk frameworks)
- Etc
And, by the way, these are not mutually exclusive requirements – to the contrary, they have mutually compounding benefits.
Only when practitioners can clearly delineate
the different specialties and competencies within Change Management,
describe their benefits and understand their relationships
– only then are they are really prepared to deliver “Change Management” value.
So, while this does not require that our definitions be identical, I ask my colleagues to give more consideration to contextualizing what you do and relating it to what other specialists within the same space do, i.e. don’t sell just your capability. Please consider the breadth and depth of change management and build up the team to meet the client’s best interests.
If you are researching Change Management to deploy within large-scale strategic change, I’d be delighted to share more with you – you can reach me at gail.severini@connerpartners.com .
_ _ _ _
Faith and I both believe that Change Management is a critical component of successful business change. As such, and along with some others, we are committed to expanding the general understanding of Change Management and will be posting multiple articles on this topic over the next several months. Some articles will be collaboratively written, others written and posted individually.
We hope you will visit both our sites. To see Faith’s blog, follow this link.
If you want to know more about who we are, you can find us both on LinkedIn. You can also read more about Faith here and if you want to contact us, you can reach Faith here and me at gail.severini@connerpartners.com.
Related Posts:
- Change Management Methodology
- Reflections on defining “Change Management” – Killer Value Proposition
- Where should Change Management reside in an Org Structure?
Filed under: - Change Execution, - Leadership, - Organization Change Management, - People Change Management, - Project Management, - Strategy and Imperatives, - Strategy Execution | Tags: Change Management, Culture, LinkedIn, Planning, ROI, Transformation
Okay, this is an experiment at crowdsourcing solutions … here’s the dilemma:
- we all know that culture is a “challenge” for our current change initiative, Program or Project (let’s be clear this is a euphemism!)
- BUT addressing culture was never raised in the business case or in the initial Program scoping
- quite possibly whoever brings it up now takes a big career risk
- What do we do – do we talk about the elephant in the room or sweep it under the rug?
Please share your thoughts by commenting. I will summarize and share mine back in a couple of days here or on a related post – don’t want to miss it … you can subscribe by email at the top left.
What do you think?
Filed under: - Innovation, - Marketing, - Organization Change Management, - People Change Management, - Project Management | Tags: Change Management, Culture, LinkedIn, Planning, Projects, ROI, Transformation, Vision
Is your Brand Promise important to you? (Huh?) Is it important to preserve a stellar customer experience during change?
As you make changes throughout your organization do you mindfully consider the impact on Brand Promise? On the culture that supports it? Many organizations take this for granted.
Do you tolerate or build (gasp!) changes that compromise the Brand Promise? continue reading here
Filed under: - Innovation, - Organization Change Management, - People Change Management, - Project Management, - Strategy and Imperatives | Tags: - Innovation, Change Management, Effectiveness, LinkedIn, Projects, ROI, Transformation
All of us – Leaders, Managers, Employees – must think differently about our roles in this “new normal”. However, this will not come naturally. The new mindsets must be adopted at the top and actively and deliberately cascaded through the organization.
Leaders, how will you get your people to embrace the changes that are required to keep the organization productive and competitive?
Our latest white paper has identified 3 channels of execution (individual, group and organizational) and 3 capability dimensions (capacity, competencies and culture) that intersect to produce 9 “pistons” of change (FYI, most often program and project change is only permitted to function within 2 of these 9). Maybe your organization already excels at, and integrates, all 9 in this framework to deploy both short-, mid- and long-term change – this is rare (think unicorn). continue reading here
Filed under: - People Change Management, - Project Management | Tags: Change Management, LinkedIn, Planning, Projects, ROI, Transformation
Recently there seems to be an increase job ads that bundle some Change Management capabilities in with Project Management. Many experienced Change Management specialists have expressed concern that a combination could detract from the value of both. The drivers are different and there is a gap. The risk is that the gap represents benefits realization. The answer lies in understanding the particular project and client environment. continue reading here
Filed under: - Organization Change Management, - People Change Management, - Project Management, - Strategy and Imperatives | Tags: Burning Platform, Change Management, Effectiveness, LinkedIn, Management Consulting, Planning, Projects, Readiness, ROI, Sponsor, Strategy, Transformation
“If we always do what we always did, we’ll always get what we always got” – True and so what?
Well, often (usually) we need to move ourselves and our people out of comfortable situations in order to achieve different (hopefully better) results. And as ‘easy’ as this looks when we put together analysis and business cases - then convince ourselves even more as we buy into the initiative vision statement – we often have a nagging doubt that implementation and benefits realization are rarely that ‘easy’.
What are the, often fatal, assumptions that could free us – could liberate our approach to do things differently? That we ignore at our own peril? continue reading here
Filed under: - Innovation, - Organization Change Management, - People Change Management, - Project Management, - Strategy and Imperatives | Tags: Change Management, Leadership, LinkedIn, Organization Design, Projects, ROI, Sponsor, Transformation
We ask these questions because leading and managing change is the economic imperative of our generation. It’s not enough to know what to change – organizations must deliver … and deliver, and deliver.
Every organization struggles with it. And this is why we have invested in Change Management mastery. What does it take? The top 5 questions for leaders:
- Is driving results out of strategic change initiatives truly a top priority for you? Enough so that you are prepared to change what you do to get it done?
- Has your team failed, or fallen short, often enough to know what it takes to succeed? Have they seen Change Management mastery?
- How much is enough? i.e. if mastery of leading and managing change requires ~50% of a leader’s time – where is that time coming from? And is a little Change Management (or junior CM capability, eg “Communications” or “Training”) in a project enough to achieve masterful results?
- If your organization is implementing strategic change across multiple SBUs or departments why wouldn’t you create organizational competence, capability and capacity?
- Would a shortfall of 2%, 5% or 10% make Change Management important enough to invest in mastery?
Do you doubt that a small niche firm like Symphini can make a difference? Ever tried to sleep with a mosquito in the room?
Have a look around the blog and the website – we’d love to chat.
Know a leader who might benefit from this reflection? Please cut and paste the url into your email and forward this post. Interested in our $500 Refer a Friend “thank you”? Have a look here. Thank you.
You may also find the following posts interesting:
Definition of Change Management:
- Defining Change Management Part 1
- Defining Change Management Part 2 – Why are there so many definitions?
- Defining Change Management Part 3 – The Business Case
Organization Design – Change Management Reporting:
Filed under: - Organization Change Management, - People Change Management, - Project Management | Tags: Adoption, Change Management, Effectiveness, Leadership, LinkedIn, Organization Design, Planning, Projects, Readiness, Resistance, ROI
This question, posted on LinkedIn, prompted some very interesting debate. My full response follows. Perhaps, more important than “mistakes”, the dialogue points to great OPPORTUNITIES for leaders and organizations who seek to become masters of change.
Firstly, there is an important distinction between ‘change management’ (CM) and Organizational Change Management (OCM). The question of “mistakes” resonates in both arenas. For context, we break it down this way: continue reading here